FedSift
FedSift Market Reports · No. 03Published 6 Oct 2026Data as of 6 Oct 2026

The Magazine Refill

The war with Iran drew down U.S. stocks of interceptors and cruise missiles faster than industry can rebuild them. Federal spending on missiles and munitions nearly doubled in response. This report covers where that money went, why so little of it went to new suppliers, and where small manufacturers can still get in.

$37.4B
Obligated for missiles & munitions, Oct 2025 – Jun 2026: 1.9× the same months a year earlier
76.7%
Went to two firms, Lockheed Martin and RTX, up from 68.7% a year earlier
≥ 77%
Flowed through contracts that existed before the war, not through new awards
13.5%
Of new-award dollars went to small businesses. In energetics and fuzes, 3.5%.
01 — Scope

What was measured, and what it is not

Built from federal obligation records for product groups 13 (ammunition & explosives) and 14 (guided missiles), 24,413 award records for these product groups in FedSift's award index, 1,253 SAM.gov notices posted May–September 2026, and the SAM registrations of the firms involved. Six limits matter enough to state before the numbers.

Read these six before quoting anything

  • "Missiles & munitions" means PSC groups 13 and 14. That covers complete missiles, missile components and launchers, bombs, rockets, ammunition of every caliber, bulk explosives, fuzes, pyrotechnics and cartridge-actuated devices. It does not cover the aircraft, ships and radars that fire them, or missile research coded as R&D.
  • Spending trends count every dollar obligated in a month, including modifications to old contracts. They come from USASpending.gov's public API, the same source FedSift ingests, because FedSift stores one lifetime total per award rather than each transaction.
  • Award-level figures (competition, offers, business size, buyers, contracts ending) come from FedSift's award index and cover awards that started in the window.
  • The comparison stops at June 2026. The Defense Department publishes contract actions about 90 days after they happen, so July–September 2026 are still filling in. Two of the largest actions of the year are not in these figures: the Army's $53.9B PAC-3 contract modification (29 July) and the Navy's $24.4B SM-6 award (1 October).
  • Business size is what the contracting officer recorded on the award, measured against that award's NAICS size standard. Veteran-owned and women-owned status comes from each firm's current SAM registration and is self-reported there.
  • IDIQ ceilings are filtered out. Only definitive contracts and task or delivery orders (award types A–D) are counted, so every dollar is an obligation.
02 — Why now

A war fought from the magazine

The U.S. and Israel began strikes on Iran on 28 February 2026. A ceasefire followed in April. The weapons spent in those weeks were the expensive ones, and the U.S. has been signing deals to replace them ever since.

"The United States will need at least three years to restore an array of critical weapons systems to prewar levels."

CSIS analysis, as reported by Defense News, 27 May 2026
Feb – Apr 2026 · The drawdown

1,000+ Tomahawks, up to 290 THAAD interceptors

CSIS estimates that rebuilding THAAD reserves runs to mid-to-late 2029 and Tomahawk to 2030 or 2031. These are the high-end interceptors and cruise missiles a production line takes years to replace.

Jul – Aug 2026 · The deals

Seven-year frameworks, and $53.9B for PAC-3

The Department of War signed seven-year agreements to triple PAC-3 and quadruple THAAD output. The Army then added $53.86B to Lockheed's existing PAC-3 contract. L3Harris and Northrop Grumman signed rocket-motor deals.

1 Oct 2026 · The Navy

$24.4B for SM-6

A five-year Navy award to Raytheon to accelerate SM-6 production. On the same day the Army asked industry how to fix the explosives supply chain beneath all of it (§06).

The framework agreements are not binding contracts, and the PAC-3 action is undefinitized, so its value and quantities can still change. Budget context: FY2027 began on 1 October under a continuing resolution that runs to 11 December 2026 (CRS). Standard continuing-resolution language bars new multiyear procurements unless Congress makes an exception.

03 — Size

Flat until March. Then two and a half times the prior year.

From October 2025 to February 2026, obligations ran almost exactly at the prior year's pace ($8.6B against $8.2B). From March to June they ran at 2.5× ($28.7B against $11.6B). By June, FY2026 had already reached 86% of all of FY2025.

Monthly obligations for missiles & munitions, FY2026 vs FY2025
$ billions · PSC groups 13 + 14 · award types A–D · labels show FY2026
FY2026 (Oct 2025 – Jun 2026)FY2025, same month
0.5
1.6
3.6
1.4
1.5
9.9
9.8
4.4
4.7
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
FY2025 values, Oct → Jun: 0.95, 2.18, 2.50, 1.41, 1.20, 3.84, 1.47, 2.92, 3.35. March 2026 was 2.6× March 2025, and April was 6.7×. The war began on 28 February. July–September 2026 are left out because Defense Department actions are published about 90 days late, so those months are not yet complete at the source.
October – June obligations, five fiscal years
$ billions · the same nine months each year, so FY2026 compares like for like
16.6
24.7
15.2
19.8
37.4
FY22
FY23
FY24
FY25
FY26
Full fiscal-year totals for comparison: FY2022 $23.0B, FY2023 $33.2B, FY2024 $34.8B, FY2025 $43.4B. Guided missiles (group 14) drove the jump, going from $15.4B to $31.9B (2.1×). Ammunition and explosives (group 13) rose from $4.4B to $5.5B (1.2×).

The money bought finished missiles. The chemistry underneath barely moved.

RankProduct (PSC)FY25 Oct–Jun $MFY26 Oct–Jun $MChange
1Guided missiles 14108,455.921,445.42.5×
2Guided missile systems, complete 14252,885.74,338.81.5×
3Guided missile components 14202,670.93,381.71.3×
4Missile launchers 14401,146.32,452.12.1×
5Bombs 13251,266.42,165.61.7×
6Ammunition over 125mm 132094.7533.35.6×
7Ammunition through 30mm 1305518.9421.00.81×
8Ammunition 75mm–125mm 1315774.3411.60.53×
9Bulk explosives 1376379.9350.60.92×
10Ammunition 30mm–75mm 1310193.9346.21.8×
11Torpedoes and components, inert 1355314.1346.01.1×
12Fuzes and primers 1390247.8187.20.76×
13Guided missile subsystems 1427117.0186.11.6×
14Pyrotechnics 137069.1170.42.5×
15Cartridge & propellant actuated devices 137796.7170.41.8×
Ranks 1–15 of 35 product codes by FY2026 dollars, contiguous. Ranks 14 and 15 are tied at $170.4M to one decimal place. Together the fifteen carry $36.9B of the $37.4B. Bulk explosives (TNT, RDX, HMX and the like) and fuzes fell while missiles rose 2.5×, which means the government bought finished rounds faster than it bought the inputs that make them.
04 — Buyers and winners

Two firms took three dollars in four

From October to June, Lockheed Martin took 49.8% of missile and munitions obligations and RTX took 27.0%. A year earlier their combined share was 68.7%. The number of firm groups receiving any money fell from 578 to 474. The surge went to the firms that already held the production lines.

Share of obligations held by the top two firms
October – June · grouped by parent company
68.7%
76.7%
FY25
FY26
Axis runs 0–80%. The top ten took 92.2% in FY2026, against 89.3% a year earlier.
RankFirm (parent)FY26 Oct–Jun $MShareFY25 share
1Lockheed Martin18,607.349.8%36.0%
2RTX (Raytheon)10,084.227.0%32.7%
3Boeing1,407.53.8%3.8%
4Dynetics (Leidos)1,094.12.9%1.0%
5Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace820.22.2%1.8%
6Northrop Grumman748.22.0%3.9%
7General Dynamics663.81.8%4.2%
8RAM-System GmbH487.31.3%2.2%
9AMTEC Corporation282.00.8%0.7%
10L3Harris (incl. Aerojet Rocketdyne)265.10.7%1.3%
Ranks 1–10, contiguous, out of 474 firm groups that received money. Recipients are grouped by parent name: all Lockheed Martin entities together, all Raytheon entities under RTX, Alliant Techsystems under Northrop Grumman, Aerojet Rocketdyne under L3Harris. Kongsberg (NSM / NASAMS) and RAM-System (RAM missile) are foreign producers that sell through U.S. programs. Northrop Grumman's dollars held steady ($763.2M → $748.2M) and General Dynamics' fell ($825.3M → $663.8M). Both are concentrated in propulsion and artillery, which did not grow at the missile rate.

Who wrote the checks

Army
$18,328.8M · 2.4× ($7,509.4M)
Navy
$9,216.1M · 1.4× ($6,756.8M)
Air Force
$7,508.6M · 1.9× ($3,909.0M)
Missile Defense Agency
$2,066.9M · 1.5× ($1,349.3M)
Defense Logistics Agency
$170.5M · 0.8× ($211.9M)
FY2026 October – June, with the FY2025 same-period figure in brackets. The Army, which buys Patriot, PAC-3, GMLRS and artillery through Redstone and Picatinny, accounted for more than half of the increase. Civilian agencies (FBI, U.S. Marshals, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center and others) buy small-arms ammunition in high volume but small dollars, and none of them reached $30M.
05 — How the money moved

The refill went through existing contracts

In an emergency, the fastest way to buy more missiles is to modify a contract the producer already holds. The data shows that is what happened. Every new munitions award that started between October and June has a combined lifetime value of $8.6B, which caps its share of the $37.4B at 23%. At least 77% of the money was added to contracts signed before the war.

Contracts with any action, Oct 2025 – Jun 2026ContractsLifetime obligations $B
Started before FY202121465.62
Started FY2021 – FY202343946.28
Started FY2024 – FY202584946.14
Started in FY20261,1597.63
2,661 contracts carried at least one action in the window. The 1,502 that pre-date FY2026 hold $158.0B of lifetime obligations, against $7.6B for the new ones. The 29 July PAC-3 action ($53.86B) follows the same pattern: it is a modification to an existing seven-year Lockheed contract, not a new award.

New awards were mostly not competed

Extent of competition, new awards Oct 2025 – Jun 2026Awards$MShare of $
Not competed (sole source)1474,860.456.8%
Not available for competition (statute, international agreement)462,251.026.3%
Full and open after exclusion of sources (incl. set-asides)56862.110.1%
Full and open competition383551.86.4%
Competed under simplified acquisition49324.00.3%
Not competed under simplified acquisition1077.30.1%
1,232 awards, $8,556.6M. 83.1% of new-award dollars were not competed. Where an award was competed, the median number of offers was two, and 48.7% drew a single offer (n=704). By product: artillery 73% single-offer, small-arms ammunition 64%, energetics and fuzes 55%, missiles 28%. One offer on a competed buy usually means only one qualified producer exists.
The bottleneck is not demand. It is the number of plants qualified to make the thing. Money can be added to an existing line in weeks; a second line takes years.
06 — What buyers are asking for

Buyers are searching for sources in public

We compared the text of all 1,253 missile and munitions notices posted May–September 2026 against the 183,381 other federal notices that carry a product code, over the same window. Munitions buyers post more Sources Sought and more pre-solicitations, and their notices carry far heavier testing and security requirements.

What the notice saysMunitionsAll federalRatioRead
First article test or lot acceptance testing required8.6%1.3%6.7×qualification
Foreign Military Sales (buying for an ally)4.1%0.9%4.5×allied demand
Capacity language (second source, surge, production capacity, industrial base)5.1%2.6%2.0×new sources
Pre-solicitation notice11.3%6.0%1.9×pipeline
Classified, export-controlled (ITAR) or Joint Certification Program required35.0%18.8%1.9×barrier
Sources Sought (buyer asking who exists)10.7%5.8%1.8×market research
Sole-source language15.3%9.4%1.6×elevated
Small-business set-aside of any kind23.5%40.9%0.58×well below norm
Text rates use the 829 munitions notices (66.2%) and 111,361 other notices whose description is long enough to read, so they are lower bounds. Notice-type and set-aside rates use all notices. Ratios are computed from unrounded rates. Both columns are measured the same way over the same window.

Notices worth reading now

These are real notices from the last four months. The ones still open on 6 October are marked open.

NoticeBuyerType · status
Energetics Center of Excellence: ideas and a possible public-private partnership to rebuild explosives capacity at Blue Grass Army Depot, KentuckyArmy, ACC-Rock IslandRFI · open to 2 Nov
Special Ammunition and Weapons Systems (SAWS): multiple-award IDIQ for non-standard and foreign-made ammunitionArmy, ACC-Rock IslandSolicitation · open to 19 Oct
Evolved SeaSparrow Missile, next significant variantNavySources Sought · open to 19 Oct
BLU-138/B penetrator warheadAir ForceSources Sought · open to 9 Oct
155mm artillery canister assemblyArmy, PicatinnySources Sought · open to 8 Oct
Explosive shape charges for the F-16 spin chute recovery systemAir ForceSources Sought · open to 12 Oct
Low-Cost Interceptor industry day, Army Portfolio Acquisition Executive FiresArmy, RCCTO RedstoneSpecial Notice · June
Patriot M903 launching stations (24) for the Lower Tier InterceptorArmyPosted as Sources Sought · intent to sole-source to Raytheon
The last row shows why notice type alone misleads. It was posted as a Sources Sought, but its text states the government's intent to award sole-source to Raytheon. It is not an opening for anyone else, and FedSift's sole-source check flags notices like it before they reach a bid list. Of the 130 missile and munitions notices open today, 17 are Sources Sought and 8 are set aside, all for small business.
07 — Small, veteran-owned, 8(a) and HUBZone firms

A deep bench, and a thin slice of the surge

4,780 active, non-excluded SAM registrants list a munitions or missile manufacturing NAICS code. 1,811 of them are small under at least one of those codes. Only 404 have won a missile or munitions award that started since FY2024. On awards starting between October and June, small businesses took 13.5% of the dollars across 672 of 1,232 awards.

Segment, new awards Oct 2025 – Jun 2026Awards$MSmall share of $Small share of awards
Missiles, components, launchers, missile propulsion 14xx, 1336–13384665,880.314.5%74.2%
Bombs and rockets 1325, 1340221,386.06.2%40.9%
Medium and large-caliber ammunition 1310–132041738.919.0%70.7%
Energetics, fuzes, pyrotechnics, demolition, CADs 1370–1377, 139098237.83.5%49.0%
Small-arms ammunition 1305396184.513.3%31.3%
Other ordnance (torpedoes, EOD tools, grenades, kits) 13xx209129.335.3%55.5%
Segments sum to 1,232 awards and $8,556.8M. Business size is as reported on each award. Small firms win the majority of missile orders (mostly components, handling equipment and repairs) and a small minority of the dollars. Energetics is where small firms are scarcest relative to need, and it is the input the Army's new RFI is about.
Registered bench (munitions & missile NAICS)Firms
Active SAM registrations, not excluded, in NAICS 325920 · 332992 · 332993 · 336414 · 336415 · 3364194,780
Small under at least one of those codes1,811
Women-owned (self-reported)611
Service-disabled veteran-owned (self-reported)525
HUBZone, current certification94
8(a), current certification58
Won a missile or munitions award starting FY2024 or later404
The 336 codes also cover space vehicles and their propulsion, so this bench includes space firms that may never make a weapon. 8(a) and HUBZone count only certifications whose exit date has not passed. Of the 414 firms that won a new award between October and June, 69 had no earlier missile or munitions award in FedSift's records. Together they took $295.4M, 3.5% of new-award dollars.

Set-asides are scarce

Of the 1,253 notices, 295 (23.5%) carried a set-aside: 258 for small business, 13 for 8(a), 12 for women-owned, 9 for SDVOSBs, 2 for Indian small business economic enterprises and 1 for HUBZone. The federal rate across all notices is 40.9%. Classification, explosives licensing and first-article testing keep most munitions work out of set-aside programs, so a small manufacturer usually enters as a supplier to a prime or through a component buy.

RankSmall-business winner (as reported on award)StateFY24–FY26 $MAwards
1AeroVironmentCA728.59
2AMTEC CorporationWI293.95
3IMT Defense Corp—245.23
4Castelion CorporationCA234.23
5Mistral IncMD191.82
6Intuitive Research and TechnologyAL182.72
7Global Military ProductsFL161.09
8Faxon MachiningOH142.95
9Action Manufacturing CompanyPA113.73
10Simulation TechnologiesTX113.52
Ranks 1–10, contiguous, by lifetime obligations on awards starting October 2023 – June 2026 where the contracting officer recorded the vendor as small. Size is measured against each award's own NAICS size standard, which is why a public company such as AeroVironment (Switchblade loitering munitions) can appear. Castelion, a hypersonic-strike start-up, is the clearest new entrant on the list. "—" means the award record carries no place-of-performance state.

What if: five routes in for a small manufacturer

If you machine metal

Sell to the primes, not the Army

77% of the money moved through Lockheed and RTX contracts, and tripling PAC-3 and quadrupling THAAD output means their supplier lists must grow. Housings, canisters, fins, launcher structures and handling equipment are machined parts. Register as a supplier with the primes' supply-chain programs and point at the specific line.

If you can handle energetics

Answer the Blue Grass RFI

Bulk explosives and fuzes fell while missiles rose 2.5×, and only 3.5% of new energetics dollars went to small firms. The Army's Energetics Center of Excellence RFI asks industry for capacity ideas through a possible public-private partnership. Responses are due 2 November.

If you can pass a first article

Answer Sources Sought notices for components

Munitions notices require first-article or lot-acceptance testing at 6.7× the federal rate. A firm that has already passed one holds the scarcest qualification in the market. The 155mm canister, the BLU-138 warhead and the F-16 shape-charge notices are all asking who can build to drawing today.

If you are veteran-owned or 8(a)

Use the few set-asides there are

Nine SDVOSB and thirteen 8(a) munitions set-asides in five months is a short list, so most of them reach few bidders. 525 registered SDVOSBs and 58 current 8(a) firms list a munitions code. Watch the set-asides with an alert rather than browsing for them.

If you build low-cost interceptors

Get in before the programs harden

Low-Cost Interceptor and alternate-interceptor industry days ran in June and August, and the Navy is prototyping a terminal-stage interceptor. Those are the openings where the primes do not yet hold the line. Castelion's appearance among the top small winners shows a new entrant can get there.

08 — Coming up

$29.6 billion reaches its end date in the next 18 months

Between April 2027 and March 2028, 538 missile and munitions contracts held by 228 incumbents reach their current end date, carrying $29.6B. That window is 6–18 months out, when the next buy is still being shaped. Unlike aircraft parts, the money here is concentrated in a few very large contracts. The 373 contracts under $10M carry only $0.61B, and small firms hold 163 contracts worth $1.17B.

Contract value reaching its end date, by quarter
$ millions · April 2027 → March 2028
6,326.6
12,332.9
5,816.1
5,122.5
Apr–Jun 27
Jul–Sep 27
Oct–Dec 27
Jan–Mar 28
RankIncumbent (legal entity)$M endingContractsBuyers
1Lockheed Martin Corporation9,020.5254
2Raytheon Company7,760.0275
3Olin Winchester1,602.7105
4The Boeing Company1,602.2354
5Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation904.2184
6Canadian Commercial Corporation891.1103
7American Ordnance728.371
8General Dynamics-OTS, Inc.684.152
9General Dynamics OTS (Wilkes-Barre)612.911
10AeroVironment532.951
Ranks 1–10, contiguous. Here firms are grouped by legal entity, so the two General Dynamics OTS entities count separately. Combined ($1,297.0M) they would rank 5th. Canadian Commercial Corporation is the Canadian government's contracting agency, which primes U.S. awards on behalf of Canadian producers. An end date is not a guaranteed recompete. Of the 15 largest contracts ending in the window, 13 were not competed or not available for competition, and those usually continue with the same producer through a follow-on or an extension. The competed contracts in the window are the realistic openings, and FedSift's recompete radar lists them one by one.
09 — Takeaways

Five takeaways for capture teams

Size

$37.4B in nine months, 1.9× a year earlier

Flat until February, then 2.5× from March to June. That is before the $53.9B PAC-3 action and the $24.4B SM-6 award, which are not yet in the data.

Concentration

The surge made the top two bigger

Lockheed and RTX went from 68.7% to 76.7%. The number of firm groups paid fell from 578 to 474. Emergency buying favors whoever already has the line running.

Mechanism

Modifications, not new contracts

At least 77% of the money went into contracts signed before the war, and 83% of new-award dollars were not competed. Watching for new RFPs alone misses most of this market.

The gap

Energetics did not keep up

Bulk explosives and fuzes fell while missiles rose 2.5×. The Army's 1 October Energetics Center of Excellence RFI is the clearest sign of where it plans to spend next.

The way in

Qualify, then supply

First-article testing appears at 6.7× the federal rate and single-offer competitions run at 48.7%. Firms that qualify a component now become the second sources these frameworks require.

10 — How this was built

Every number above is a query you can rerun

This report comes from FedSift's award and solicitation index, the same data capture teams use for recompete radar, incumbent analysis and Sources Sought tracking. It counts obligations only, never IDIQ ceilings, and FedSift flags sole-source notices like the Patriot launcher notice above before they reach a bid list.

Run the same analysis for your product code or NAICS: which munitions notices are open now, which are set aside for you, who holds the contracts ending in your window, and which buyers are asking for new sources.

FedSift Market Reports break down one federal market every other week. No. 01: Where the Drone Money Goes. No. 02: The Parts Gap. See all reports.